Factory pollution smoke

Joint statement on Toyota AGM

IStorebrand Asset Management, AkademikerPension response following results of climate lobbying vote

By  Storebrand
ARTICLE · PUBLISHED 16.06.2023

We are glad to see so many investors supporting our resolution on disclosure of Toyota’s lobbying activities. The high backing should serve as a clear wake up call for the company to focus on being competitive in the transition to the net zero society instead of trying to water down important climate legislation, including phasing out internal combustion engines. Given the two-thirds requirement we are not surprised that the proposal was not passed, and we note that many institutional investors pre-declared in public the support for the resolution.

The aim of this proposal is to protect long term shareholder value and mitigate reputational risk, not only to successfully deliver on the Net Zero commitment, but also for the long-term sustainability of the business. We will continue to engage actively and support Toyota.


Background

The proposing shareholders recognise the centrality of ambitious climate policy and responsible corporate climate lobbying to limiting global warming to 1.5⁰C, in line with the Paris Agreement. We recognise that corporate lobbying directly and through organisations such as trade associations has frequently opposed policy measures that would support the goal of delivering net-zero emissions by 2050. Equally, we recognise that responsible corporate lobbying has the potential to unlock action on climate transition initiatives.

This proposal focused on protecting and enhancing the long-term shareholder value and was a response to a clear financial risk associated with Toyota’s lagging transition, negative climate lobbying and reputational risk.

Toyota has demonstrated leadership on climate change in a number of important areas. However, despite improved transparency, the company has also continued to lobby against climate-related regulation and policies in several countries, according to independent think tank InfluenceMap.

After more than two years of intense investor engagement with Toyota, it has unfortunately not been possible to reach common ground with the company on its lobbying activities. Hence, we submitted the shareholder proposal urging Toyota to improve disclosures of its lobbying activities and demonstrate further industry leadership in support of the goals of the Paris Agreement.

We are investors concerned with long-term shareholder value and leading up to this annual general assembly we have seen many other Toyota shareholders having the same concern support the proposal. We believe it is in the company’s best interest to be open and transparent on its lobbying activities as it will enhance Toyota’s market value, and we will continue to engage actively and support Toyota in this journey.


The Resolution (2023) 


1. Details of the proposal
It is proposed that the following provision be added to the Articles of Incorporation.
The Company shall conduct a comprehensive, annual review and issue a report (at reasonable cost, omitting proprietary information) describing if, and how, the Company’s climate-related lobbying activities (direct and through industry associations), including public statements, serve to reduce risks for the Company from climate change and how they align with the goals of the Paris Agreement and the Company’s goal of carbon neutrality by 2050. The report should disclose any instances of misalignment with those goals, along with the planned actions to address these.

2. Reason for the proposal
The new provision in the Articles of Incorporation is intended to ensure that the Company makes robust disclosures, as part of its annual reporting, of
(i) which lobbying activities directed at the issue of climate change the group companies are pursuing (whether through directly or indirectly influencing the legislative and administrative process or through public influence activities), and
(ii) the extent to which these serve to reduce risks for the group companies from climate change and how they are aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement of 12 December 2015 to keep average global temperature rise well-below 2 degrees Celsius, aiming for 1.5 degrees Celsius.  

The co-filing Shareholders of the proposal recognise and appreciate that the Company issued a second report on climate lobbying in December 2022; “Toyota’s Views on Climate Public Policies 2022.” However, like the first report, this report falls far short of investor expectations as set forth, for example, by the Climate Action 100+ Net Zero Company Benchmarks for Climate Policy Engagement (please see the October 2021 edition (ENG) (JPN) and the September 2021 edition (ENG) (JPN) for details).

Using the CA100+ Benchmark criteria, the quality of the Company’s disclosure on climate policy engagement as of December 2022 was scored 36/100, the same low score as of December 2021.  The co-filing Shareholders of the proposal find that the Company and shareholders alike could benefit from a strengthening of the Company’s disclosures in
1) scope, covering more jurisdictions and trade associations, and
2) rigor in the analysis of potential misalignment with the goals of the Paris Agreement, and seek to support such strengthening by proposing an adjustment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to introduce annual reporting on this material topic to the Company, shareholders and wider stakeholder groups in line with global investor expectations.  


Such disclosures could serve to mitigate reputational and other risks, including potential backlash from customers, business partners, employees and investors associated with the Company’s climate-related lobbying activities in recent years.  The co-filing Shareholders of the proposal and other like-minded institutional shareholders of the Company have engaged intensively and constructively with the Company since 2021 and encourage the Board of Directors to support and recommend a vote for this proposal. 

 


Related content:

Toyota climate lobbying dialogue stalls

 

Latest insights

Can the business sector close the human rights due diligence gap?

20.12.2024 Storebrand Asset Management
Roundup and reflections on the recent UN Forum on Business and Human Rights

The Big Interview: Tulia Machado-Helland

16.12.2024 Storebrand Asset Management
On the relevance of human rights to managing portfolio risk in an increasingly conflict-filled and tech-driven global landscape.

Frontline looks ‘tempting’, says Storebrand’s $1.6bn fund manager as shipping stock rally unwinds

13.12.2024 Jonas Walsgård, TradeWinds
Funds hold Golden Ocean, Hafnia, Stolt-Nielsen and Wallenius Wilhelmsen

Historical returns are no guarantee of future returns. Future returns will depend, among other things, on market developments, the manager's skills, the fund's risk profile and management fees. The returns can be negative as a result of price losses. There is risk associated with investments in the fund due to market movements, developments in currency, interest rates, economic conditions, industry- and company-specific conditions. Before investing, customers are advised to familiarize themselves with the fund's key information and prospectus, which contains further information about the fund's characteristics and costs.